By bizn_fun 
Dr Gurr acknowledged for some staff it had been a “tough” period, but said he believed the Turing was now “match fit”.
“There are two things that we have in the UK that are truly special,” he said.
“We have fantastic talent and we have unbelievable data sets – let’s get in, let’s focus on those areas that really matter.”
He said he sympathised with staff who had criticised their workplace under his leadership, but did not apologise.
And he agreed with Kyle, who is now business secretary, that the Institute should focus on defence – but added it would continue with other projects themed around the environment, sustainability and health.
Current projects include increasing the accuracy of weather forecasting, reducing transport emissions, and cardiac research on human hearts using digital twins.
Questions remain over how much overlap there will be between the Turing Institute’s new direction and other UK agencies carrying out similar work – such as UKRI and the MOD – in addition to commercial tech firms.
Dr Gurr acknowledged its defence work, which includes research on how best to secure the UK’s national critical infrastructure, was “not exclusive” but said it was responding to a request at a time of need.
“The world probably feels like it’s become a much more dangerous place over the last couple of years,” he said.
“I think the other thing that’s become very clear when you look at some of the theatres of conflict around the world is that data and technology is to play an increasingly critical role in whatever form of hostilities happen.
“The Turing has had a long track record of working in these spaces.”
But the original whistleblowers, who still remain working at the organisation, believe the reputation of the Institute is “in tatters” following recent events.
They spoke to me on the condition of anonymity because they fear losing their jobs.
“This is not a new chapter for the Turing,” they said.
“It is the same words under a new heading.”